Mozilla has released a statement saying that Chrome’s latest feature, which allows websites to track users’ activity, is a violation of the company’s privacy policy. “Chrome’s new tracking feature is a clear violation of our privacy policy and we are not happy with it,” said Mozilla spokesperson Liz McMillan in a statement. “We encourage Google to change its policy and stop tracking users.” Google has defended the feature, saying that it is necessary in order to improve website performance. However, many users are concerned about their privacy being invaded. “I don’t like the idea of my browsing history being tracked by Google,” said user Sarah. “It feels like they’re watching everything I do.” ..
Chrome 94 has officially dropped. As is always the case with a new browser version, there’s plenty to be excited about. However, there are also some items to be skeptical about, including a feature Mozilla claims enables surveillance on you.
How Chrome’s New Feature Is “Harmful”
Chrome 94 introduces a controversial idle detection API. Basically, websites can ask Chrome to report when a user with a web page open is idle on their device. It’s not just about your usage of Chrome or a particular website: If you’ve stepped away from your computer and aren’t using any applications, Chrome can tell the website you’re not actively using your computer.
As you might expect, developers love this new feature—anything that can provide them with more information regarding how users are interacting with their apps is a positive. It’s enabled by default in Chrome 94, but it might not be as bad as it sounds. Like using your webcam or microphone, a prompt will ask your permission before using your idle data on a particular website.
The API comes with its fair share of opponents, including rival browser-maker Mozilla. The folks behind Firefox say that it creates an “opportunity for surveillance capitalism.” Mozilla’s Web Standards Lead Tantek Çelik commented on GitHub, saying:
Of course, Mozilla competes with Google Chrome, so it’s not surprising that a competitor might have strong words about something Google is doing.
Thus I propose labeling this API harmful, and encourage further incubation, perhaps reconsidering simpler, less-invasive alternative approaches to solve the motivating use-cases.
However, it isn’t just Mozilla. Apple’s Safari browser uses WebKit, and the WebKit development team also had a lot to say about the new API. Here’s what Ryosuke Niwa, an Apple software engineer who works on WebKit said:
Chrome 94 Is Here!
We’ll have to wait and see how developers use this new API in Chrome. It could end being an absolute privacy nightmare—or it could be no big deal.
And, either way, it’s worth remembering that websites can’t get notified of your idle status unless they ask you first and you agree to share it.
Either way, there’s some good stuff coming in Google Chrome 94, and it’s worth downloading for just the security fixes alone.
